←back to thread

British naval dominance during the age of sail

(www.lesswrong.com)
97 points surprisetalk | 1 comments | 16 May 25 13:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
roter ◴[16 May 25 14:29 UTC] No.44005946[source]▶
There is also the theory that the British just had more practice at gunnery and sailhandling while blockading the French/Spanish in the various ports.
replies(3): >>44006168 #>>44006719 #>>44007197 #
wagwangbosy ◴[16 May 25 16:16 UTC] No.44007197[source]▶
The french navy had been super formidable throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. I don't really get how they folded so quickly to the UK.
replies(2): >>44009603 #>>44009874 #
bell-cot ◴[16 May 25 20:37 UTC] No.44009603[source]▶
France ditched most of its senior naval officers late in the 18th century, for the "crime" of being loyal to the prior regime: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution
replies(1): >>44009941 #
zardo ◴[16 May 25 21:27 UTC] No.44009941[source]▶
The French army purged old loyalists and replaced them with young officers, but wound up more capable, not less.
replies(1): >>44010376 #
1. mncharity ◴[16 May 25 22:35 UTC] No.44010376[source]▶
Copilot contrasts the army's extensive battlefield promotions, broad and rapid, versus the navy's leadership funnel narrowed and slowed by specialized skills and more limited opportunities to develop and demonstrate them.