←back to thread

647 points bradgessler | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.489s | source
Show context
curl-up ◴[] No.44009301[source]
> The fun has been sucked out of the process of creation because nothing I make organically can compete with what AI already produces—or soon will.

So the fun, all along, was not in the process of creation itself, but in the fact that the creator could somehow feel superior to others not being able to create? I find this to be a very unhealthy relationship to creativity.

My mixer can mix dough better than I can, but I still enjoy kneading it by hand. The incredibly good artisanal bakery down the street did not reduce my enjoyment of baking, even though I cannot compete with them in quality by any measure. Modern slip casting can make superior pottery by many different quality measures, but potters enjoy throwing it on a wheel and producing unique pieces.

But if your idea of fun is tied to the "no one else can do this but me", then you've been doing it wrong before AI existed.

replies(14): >>44009329 #>>44009344 #>>44009382 #>>44009383 #>>44009447 #>>44009580 #>>44009601 #>>44009759 #>>44009774 #>>44009818 #>>44009920 #>>44009945 #>>44009977 #>>44010301 #
1. movpasd ◴[] No.44009383[source]
Sometimes the fun is in creating something useful, as a human, for humans. We want to feel useful to our tribe.
replies(1): >>44012048 #
2. rkhassen9 ◴[] No.44012048[source]
I think you articulated the actual point of the OP. It isn’t so much about creating something better than anyone else, but it is a feeling that your contribution and world means something.

AI can somehow cause one to react with a feeling of futility.

Engaging in acts of creation, and responding to others acts of creation seems a way out of that feeling.