←back to thread

292 points carabiner | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.408s | source
Show context
ipsum2 ◴[] No.44008356[source]
MIT's article is quite scant on details. WSJ has more information, but still no specifics: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/mit-says-it-no-longer-stands-beh...

> The paper was championed by MIT economists Daron Acemoglu, who won the 2024 economics Nobel, and David Autor. The two said they were approached in January by a computer scientist with experience in materials science who questioned how the technology worked, and how a lab that he wasn’t aware of had experienced gains in innovation. Unable to resolve those concerns, they brought it to the attention of MIT, which began conducting a review.

replies(3): >>44008405 #>>44008764 #>>44009276 #
timewizard[dead post] ◴[] No.44008764[source]
[flagged]
in9 ◴[] No.44008774[source]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Memorial_Prize_l...
replies(1): >>44008790 #
throwup238 ◴[] No.44008790[source]
Nobel _Memorial_ Prize in Economic Sciences

That’s not a Nobel Prize.

replies(1): >>44008842 #
bee_rider ◴[] No.44008842[source]
If that’s the distinction, it would have been helpful for the original comment to note that they were just sharing some silly trivia instead of making a point.
replies(2): >>44008934 #>>44009144 #
belter ◴[] No.44009144[source]
The comment means remember 1974. Cough cough Hayek... cough... Samuelson...
replies(1): >>44009200 #
1. bee_rider ◴[] No.44009200[source]
What are we afraid of summoning Voldemort or something here? Just say whatever you are coughing at, lol.
replies(1): >>44010877 #
2. tough ◴[] No.44010877[source]
he was a decade early