←back to thread

386 points carabiner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ipsum2 ◴[] No.44008356[source]
MIT's article is quite scant on details. WSJ has more information, but still no specifics: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/mit-says-it-no-longer-stands-beh...

> The paper was championed by MIT economists Daron Acemoglu, who won the 2024 economics Nobel, and David Autor. The two said they were approached in January by a computer scientist with experience in materials science who questioned how the technology worked, and how a lab that he wasn’t aware of had experienced gains in innovation. Unable to resolve those concerns, they brought it to the attention of MIT, which began conducting a review.

replies(3): >>44008405 #>>44008764 #>>44009276 #
timewizard[dead post] ◴[] No.44008764[source]
[flagged]
colechristensen ◴[] No.44008886[source]
This is inaccurate pedantry. It is commonly referred to as the nobel prize in economics and administered by the same foundation, the funding for it is a gift to the foundation from the Swedish central bank instead of being sourced from Nobel's estate.
replies(1): >>44008941 #
Keyframe ◴[] No.44008941[source]
yeah, but also "Nobel accuses the awarding institution of misusing his family's name, and states that no member of the Nobel family has ever had the intention of establishing a prize in economics." It's hijacking of the brand.
replies(3): >>44009002 #>>44009141 #>>44009226 #
1. colechristensen ◴[] No.44009141{5}[source]
The grandson of Alfred Nobel's older brother complained publicly 20 years ago... about a prize that's been given now for nearly 60 years.

Yawn.

Distant relation of man who used his fortune making explosives to give a prize to prominent academic unhappy, complains. The foundation got to make the decision, was given the name. This is "old man yells at cloud" level of discourse. This distant relation has less of a right to say how the name gets to be used than the foundation created by the man.