←back to thread

310 points rbanffy | 9 comments | | HN request time: 1.307s | source | bottom
1. pavlov ◴[] No.44008903[source]
Roman numerals in software versioning should make a comeback.

The Cicero-approved desktop of MS-DOS programs from this moricons.dll set would include these:

Applause II 1.5

Framework III

Crosstalk-XVI 3.71

PC Paintbrush IV Plus

And of course you’d want dBase III+ and Deluxe Paint II Enhanced.

replies(3): >>44009285 #>>44009375 #>>44010252 #
2. PTOB ◴[] No.44009285[source]
I support this. "Windows XI" looks so much more professional and enigmatic.
replies(4): >>44009467 #>>44010112 #>>44013231 #>>44029557 #
3. joemi ◴[] No.44009375[source]
No thanks. Then it just causes confusion when some people use the roman numerals and other people convert them to arabic numerals. Especially for cases like Applause and Crosstalk mentioned above.
4. pavlov ◴[] No.44009467[source]
This website best experienced with Chrome CXXXVII+ on Windows XI Enhanced.
replies(1): >>44011119 #
5. ◴[] No.44010112[source]
6. themadturk ◴[] No.44010252[source]
Lotus I-II-III?
7. jasomill ◴[] No.44011119{3}[source]
Build ↂↂↁↀⅭ.ↀↁⅬⅩⅠ
8. AStonesThrow ◴[] No.44013231[source]
You may laugh, but when I heard that Microsoft was working on code-name "Cairo" I turned that around phonetically in my head until I realized they were indeed referring to "Windows Chi-Rho".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Rho

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP

9. int_19h ◴[] No.44029557[source]
They should go all the way to Windows MMXXV etc.