←back to thread

Sci-Net

(sci-hub.se)
260 points greyface- | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.298s | source
Show context
A_Duck ◴[] No.44004852[source]
Why must crypto infect everything good?

Is the incentive even necessary? It would be worth testing if there are enough scientists who are keen to promote information sharing in their field without some minimal reward

I also wonder if this will make the penalties for uploaders more severe since it becomes a commercial act

replies(9): >>44004901 #>>44005032 #>>44005102 #>>44005128 #>>44005278 #>>44005498 #>>44006265 #>>44006289 #>>44008529 #
setgree ◴[] No.44005278[source]
If there was every a ready-made use case for crypto, it's this. Alexandra Elbakyan is both a criminal in most places and a hero to many [0]. I want her to keep doing what she's doing, and that means someone probably has to pay her to do it. The whole point of Bitcoin is to make money permisionless, i.e. the right tool for this particular job.

[0] https://www.science.org/content/article/frustrated-science-s...

replies(5): >>44005315 #>>44005398 #>>44005520 #>>44006188 #>>44006418 #
jsheard ◴[] No.44005315[source]
Even if crypto is the only viable way to do this, doing it with their own memecoin instead of something that's already well established is a massive red flag. That means they can easily pre-mine vast amounts of their token for effectively nothing and then cash out by selling them all at once when the price peaks. Textbook shitcoin rug-pull.
replies(3): >>44005502 #>>44005884 #>>44008670 #
1. Funes- ◴[] No.44008670[source]
>doing it with their own memecoin instead of something that's already well established is a massive red flag.

It is. You want to reward people for their work in a private and reliable way? Monero's right there.