←back to thread

197 points proberts | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.247s | source

I'll be here for the next 5-6 hours. As usual, there are countless topics given the rapidly changing immigration landscape and I'll be guided by whatever you're concerned with. Please remember that I can't provide legal advice on specific cases because I won't have access to all the facts. Please stick to a factual discussion in your questions and I'll try to do the same in my answers.

Edit: I am taking a break now and will return later this afternoon/evening to respond to any comments and answer any questions. Thank you everyone for a great and engaged AMA so far.

Show context
neom ◴[] No.44006665[source]
There has been a bunch of chatter in Canadian founders whatsapp groups about people getting detained for long periods of time coming into the states either at SFO or pre-clear in Canada. Are you advising Canadians travel with any additional documentation these days?
replies(5): >>44006947 #>>44007317 #>>44008176 #>>44009067 #>>44010765 #
__turbobrew__ ◴[] No.44006947[source]
Im a Canadian and go to the US for work fairly regularly. Something I didn’t realize is that the laws are different in preclearance areas. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-19.32/FullText.ht...

For example, you are allowed to withdraw your application to enter the US and leave the preclearance area. Additionally you are bound by different laws for search and siezure.

At this point I am only going to the US through preclearance areas because you are still on Canadian soil and bound by Canadian laws. That doesn’t necessarily mean that USBP won’t break those laws, but the Canadian courts get to decide if laws were broken instead of the US courts.

One thing I have not found a straight answer on yet is if USBP can compel you to unlock your electronic devices in a preclearance area. My current strategy is if I am asked to do that in preclearance I will withdraw my application to enter because Im not letting anyone access to my phone.

replies(4): >>44007205 #>>44008147 #>>44009605 #>>44011082 #
KerrAvon ◴[] No.44007205[source]
That’s only the Canada -> US leg, though. They can still grab your phone on the US -> Canada return trip, ne pas?
replies(4): >>44007314 #>>44007451 #>>44008558 #>>44009938 #
klipt ◴[] No.44007314[source]
Historically the US has not had much "exit control".

For example leaving the Schengen area it's obligatory to go through "exit immigration" and get your passport stamped. Leaving the US, you show your passport to the airline, but usually there is no formal immigration check at all.

replies(4): >>44007653 #>>44008256 #>>44009248 #>>44010662 #
the_mitsuhiko ◴[] No.44007653[source]
That’s because the airline updates your I-94 for you. If they don’t you risk overstaying. There is a website you can use to validate that they did everything correctly.
replies(2): >>44008022 #>>44008537 #
1. raverbashing ◴[] No.44008022[source]
Yeah, once upon a time you had to return your actual I-94 stamped to your passport to the airline, but today this is done automatically on the background