←back to thread

I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney, who does work for YC and startups. AMA

197 points proberts | 1 comments | 16 May 25 15:05 UTC | HN request time: 0.215s | source

I'll be here for the next 5-6 hours. As usual, there are countless topics given the rapidly changing immigration landscape and I'll be guided by whatever you're concerned with. Please remember that I can't provide legal advice on specific cases because I won't have access to all the facts. Please stick to a factual discussion in your questions and I'll try to do the same in my answers.

Edit: I am taking a break now and will return later this afternoon/evening to respond to any comments and answer any questions. Thank you everyone for a great and engaged AMA so far.

Show context
0xy ◴[16 May 25 15:20 UTC] No.44006557[source]▶
I'm moving to the US on a K1 visa, is it possible to expedite an EAD on the basis of a job offer in an AI field?
replies(1): >>44006587 #
proberts ◴[16 May 25 15:23 UTC] No.44006587[source]▶
Expedites are available for all USCIS filings and while it's worth it to request it here, your reason isn't like to meet the expedite requirements, which are listed on the USCIS website.
replies(1): >>44007372 #
Intermernet ◴[16 May 25 16:34 UTC] No.44007372[source]▶
Is the correct term "Expedites", or "Expeditions"? Legal terminology seems to break language rules... The term for some (plural) things being expedited would be expeditions, but it seems from your response that, in legal terms, this would be expedites. This doesn't sound right. No source I could find agrees with the term "Expedites" as "plural of expedite". It generally returns something on the lines of "A third-person singular simple present indicative form of the verb "expedite.""
replies(1): >>44007621 #
1. proberts ◴[16 May 25 16:59 UTC] No.44007621[source]▶
Expedites as a noun like invites, arguably not grammatically correct but in common use so correct from a usage standpoint.