←back to thread

276 points rbanffy | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.009s | source
Show context
90s_dev ◴[] No.44005274[source]
When I was a kid, my dad upgraded our home computer from DOS 5 or 6 to Windows 3.11 for Workgroups. It was the first GUI that I ever used, and it was amazing comparitively. Every app was mysterious and innovative and wonderful.

I tried Borland C++ and it was absolutely confusing, but I was probably just too young. Even QBasic was deeply confusing for a long time, but eventually I finally made a simple, terribly written and horribly broken Bomberman clone.

Those looking to experience something similar to that feeling should buy pico8.

replies(7): >>44005746 #>>44005922 #>>44006069 #>>44006932 #>>44008711 #>>44009468 #>>44011321 #
sksrbWgbfK ◴[] No.44005746[source]
> Even QBasic was deeply confusing for a long time

For one whole year, I thought that Qbasic and Turbo Pascal were text editors that could also run games. I didn't understood that I had access to real compilers and that I could actually change the programs. Sometimes kids are stupid...

As for your Pico8 suggestion, you can always get the open-source equivalent https://tic80.com/ if you don't have the money.

replies(7): >>44005782 #>>44006843 #>>44007213 #>>44007593 #>>44008129 #>>44008689 #>>44010739 #
1. agumonkey ◴[] No.44007593[source]
It's a testimony of Turbo Pascal team.. the things was so lean and swift, compilation was near transparent. All this on early pentium and old cpus..
replies(1): >>44008059 #
2. stevekemp ◴[] No.44008059[source]
I continue to run Turbo Pascal on a Z80-based machine, with 64k of RAM. A pentium would be luxury!
replies(1): >>44009629 #
3. mattl ◴[] No.44009629[source]
Amstrad CPC or Tatung Einstein?

(Hi Steve!)