←back to thread

479 points plam503711 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
o_m ◴[] No.44004715[source]
At my last job (a billion dollar company) someone had set up some kind of proxy where one free user account was used by ~100 employees. We wanted some more features they didn't offer so we looked at some of their competitors. I was in the meeting where we were going to decide to keep using what we had or use the better solution (in my opinion). Both were presented fairly except for the price. The plan was to continue the piracy, not paying what it should cost, or use the other service which would have been cheaper if done legally. I voiced my concern that if we are going to compare them we should at least compare them with their actual cost. No one shared my concern and they ended up with not switching a just continue pirating, even though money wasn't really an issue. The person who set this up wasn't in the company anymore, but I guess no one wanted to deal with this issue and decided it was easier to ignore it.
replies(1): >>44005077 #
axus ◴[] No.44005077[source]
How much money did they save over 5-10 years through this illegal or unethical behavior?

If "Rocket Company" averaged 30 machines per month, max $1600 per month let's say $600k / year before discount. Maybe kept 3 million dollars over 10 years. I imagine the only way Vates will get paid for their service is if control is taken from the operational groups doing the actual work and "abstracted" to a centralized IT group.

replies(2): >>44007324 #>>44007899 #
1. JoblessWonder ◴[] No.44007324[source]
FYI they said "hundreds of physical hosts" so it is significantly more than that.