←back to thread

370 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.534s | source
Show context
btbuildem ◴[] No.44006974[source]
> To balance safety and utility, Codex was trained to identify and precisely refuse requests aimed at development of malicious software, while clearly distinguishing and supporting legitimate tasks.

I can't say I am a big fan of neutering these paradigm-shifting tools according to one culture's code of ethics / way of doing business / etc.

One man's revolutionary is another's enemy combatant and all that. What if we need top-notch malware to take down the robot dogs lobbing mortars at our madmaxian compound?!

replies(5): >>44007032 #>>44007194 #>>44007285 #>>44007307 #>>44009425 #
1. amarcheschi ◴[] No.44007032[source]
If I had to guess, only for the general public they'll be neutered, not for the 3 letters agencies
replies(1): >>44007266 #
2. pixl97 ◴[] No.44007266[source]
TLA's have very few of their own coders, they contract everything out. Now I'm sure OAI will lend an unrestricted model to groups that pay large private contracts they won't disclose.