←back to thread

Sci-Net

(sci-hub.se)
259 points greyface- | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
RankingMember ◴[] No.44005815[source]
> The only downside is that obtaining Sci-Hub tokens on the Solana network can be a non-trivial puzzle for a user who are new to crypto. But that only makes the process more interesting.

Nah, that will ensure a huge swath of users can't/won't access, as they don't have the time/inclination to figure out the crypto aspect. Some will rebut this with "but they're getting it for free!", but a huge part of the value proposition of sci-hub.se is the ease of use- even people with legitimate access to an article used sci-hub because it's simply a smoother interface. This kills that.

replies(2): >>44005914 #>>44005945 #
troyvit ◴[] No.44005945[source]
I think that also works in the favor of Sci-hub though.

> I regularly receive requests from Sci-Hub users to help them download some paper that cannot be opened through Sci-Hub. The number of such requests increased in the past two years, since Sci-Hub database updates were paused. The opposite also happens: users ask whether they can upload to Sci-Hub some paper that they have bought or downloaded via university subscription.

Now, instead of having to deal with all those requests, Sci-hub can point users to this market to get the paper instead of eating up its limited personal resources. Papers that they can automatically scrape will still be there as always, this is just to handle those special requests that need a human. If the user can't or won't set up a coin then they don't want the paper badly enough. I mean heck they can always go buy it from the journal.

replies(1): >>44006155 #
1. aleph_minus_one ◴[] No.44006155[source]
> Now, instead of having to deal with all those requests, Sci-hub can point users to this market to get the paper instead of eating up its limited personal resources.

The problem is not the limited resources of sci-hub, but that sci-hub actively decided to stop updating its database:

> https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/205911/why-did-...

This is actually the reason for the huge increase of the number of requests as the article explicitly admits:

> "The number of such requests increased in the past two years, since Sci-Hub database updates were paused."

> https://sci-hub.se/sci-net