←back to thread

Ollama violating llama.cpp license for over a year

(github.com)
202 points Jabrov | 1 comments | 16 May 25 10:36 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
gmm1990 ◴[16 May 25 13:23 UTC] No.44005203[source]▶
The same MIT license is in the ollama project as is in the llama.cpp project, is this not sufficient?

llamma.cpp https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/LICENSE

ollama.cpp https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/LICENSE

replies(3): >>44005355 #>>44005403 #>>44005850 #
1. Etheryte ◴[16 May 25 14:20 UTC] No.44005850[source]▶
No, this completely misses the point of what the issue is about. You're missing the copyright holder information, the rest of the license is almost secondary to that fact.