Ollama violating llama.cpp license for over a year

Take a look at https://github.com/containers/ramalama/tree/main#credit-wher... for comparison. Ollama really should improve their acknowledgements and check license conformance more thoroughly.

And yet, neither the named individual or "The ggml authors" (as stated as the Copyright holder in llama.cpp/LICENSE) is mentioned here.

This "high-5" acknowledgement isn't license compliance.