←back to thread

474 points plam503711 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
florbnit ◴[] No.44004552[source]
> We’re not going to waste days chasing them. But at some point, this goes beyond saving a few bucks: it becomes performance art.

Oh for the love of tech, do chase them. This absolutely has to be in void of the terms of your trial take them to court. If not, then at the very least name and shame the company, so some dumb manager orchestrating this silly theft will get fired and someone more mature can be rotated in.

replies(7): >>44004613 #>>44004622 #>>44004679 #>>44004709 #>>44005332 #>>44007040 #>>44009381 #
plam503711 ◴[] No.44004613[source]
I’m actually considering reaching out directly to the CEO and telling the full story. But honestly? There’s a good chance he’s fully aware — and totally fine with it. That’s part of what makes it so disappointing.

We’re not rushing into legal action — it’s not worth the energy for now — but publicly calling out the behavior felt necessary. It also sends a message to others in the ecosystem about the kind of nonsense OSS maintainers sometimes face.

And yes, while I’m still holding off on naming the company directly… I haven’t ruled it out.

replies(11): >>44004717 #>>44004734 #>>44004740 #>>44004748 #>>44004836 #>>44004930 #>>44005036 #>>44005106 #>>44005234 #>>44007093 #>>44009913 #
bambax ◴[] No.44004740[source]
> publicly calling out the behavior

> I’m still holding off on naming the company directly

Does not compute. Why not name them?

replies(6): >>44004759 #>>44004763 #>>44004769 #>>44004892 #>>44005131 #>>44005166 #
1. threeseed ◴[] No.44005166[source]
Because this is almost always just the fault of some low level engineer trying to save some time rather than some systemic issue at the heart of the company.

The company will just apologise and the CEO will make sure to tell everyone they know never to deal with this vendor ever again. IT is a very small world and reputations last a long time.