←back to thread

474 points plam503711 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.404s | source
Show context
voidUpdate ◴[] No.44004574[source]
Unhappy with AI generated contributions, but perfectly happy to have a big AI generated image at the top of their page, complete with spelling mistakes
replies(1): >>44004676 #
garrettjoecox ◴[] No.44004676[source]
One bothers people like you, one has the potential to waste people’s time and energy.

Unless your job involves critiquing the header image of people’s personal blogs I don’t think these are equivalent.

replies(1): >>44004906 #
1. voidUpdate ◴[] No.44004906[source]
The both imply a similar lack of care to me. Like, not even being bothered to check the words, and if they make no sense just click the magic "generate image" button again, or fix them in photoshop or just erase them...
replies(1): >>44006620 #
2. zamadatix ◴[] No.44006620[source]
You're probably right in that they didn't really care if the header image was top quality. The codebase or security reviews, understandably, will have a different need for quality.