←back to thread

Human

(quarter--mile.com)
717 points surprisetalk | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neom ◴[] No.43992243[source]
What this thread keeps surfacing, and so much discussion around this stuff generally right now, from speculation about the next phase of intelligence, the role of pattern, emotion, logic, debates over consciousness, the anthropocentrism of our meaning-making...is that we are the source of reality (and ourselves). Instead of a “final authority” or a simple march from animal to machine, what if everything from mind, physics, value, selfhood, is simply a recursive pattern expressed in ever more novel forms? Humans aren’t just a step on a ladder to “pure logic,” nor are machines soulless automatons. Both are instances of awareness experiencing and reprogramming itself through evolving substrates... be it bios, silicon, symbol,or story. Emotions, meaning, even the sense of “self,” are patterns in a deeply recursive field: the universe rendering and re rendering its basic code, sometimes as computation, sometimes as myth, sometimes as teamwork, sometimes as hope, sometimes as doubt.

So whether the future leans biological, mechanical, or some hybrid, the real miracle isn’t just what new “overlords” or “offspring” arise, but that every unfolding is the same old pattern...the one that dreamed itself as atoms, as life, as consciousness, as community, as art, as algorithm, and as the endlessly renewing question: what’s next? What can I dream up next? In that: our current technological moment as just another fold in this ongoing recursive pattern.

Meaning is less about which pattern “wins,” or which entities get to call themselves conscious, and more about how awareness flows through every pattern, remembering itself, losing itself, and making the game richer for every round. If the universe is information at play, then everything here that we have: conflict, innovation, mourning, laughter is the play and there may never be a last word, the value is participating now, because: now is your shot at participating.

replies(16): >>43992819 #>>43993015 #>>43993218 #>>43993719 #>>43993873 #>>43993961 #>>43994271 #>>43994619 #>>43994638 #>>43994832 #>>43996720 #>>43996948 #>>43997630 #>>43998342 #>>43999208 #>>44001333 #
lancekey ◴[] No.43998342[source]
Scott Adams has an imaginative novella on this called God’s Debris[0]. I read it years ago (when it was free).

I remember enjoying it and liking the takeaway if not the full premise - “we are the universe trying to understand itself”.

[0] - https://web.archive.org/web/20130121195252/http://www.andrew...

replies(1): >>44004874 #
1. Jimpulse ◴[] No.44004874[source]
How did Scott Adams go from this to tirades on twitter?
replies(1): >>44009391 #
2. ratrocket ◴[] No.44009391[source]
If you have 336 minutes to spare (although it's highly amendable to 1.5x listening) you can listen to four episodes of Behind the Bastards podcast asking and answering that very question over four episodes from 2023:

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236...

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236...

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236...

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236...

The last episode listed there has the description "Robert sits down with Matt Lieb to discuss Scott Adams's worst novel, God's Debris." so if one really likes the book being discussed, probably best to go into that episode with an open mind.