←back to thread

The Awful German Language (1880)

(faculty.georgetown.edu)
186 points nalinidash | 2 comments | 16 May 25 04:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.454s | source
Show context
bashkiddie ◴[16 May 25 07:48 UTC] No.44002796[source]▶
Reading the article I guess Mark Twain never had a knowledgeable teacher. Is there anything hacker news readers would like to know about the German language?
replies(3): >>44002828 #>>44007857 #>>44009822 #
iamsaitam ◴[16 May 25 07:53 UTC] No.44002828[source]▶
Why do nouns have "random" articles attached to them? In latin languages like Portuguese the ending of the word tells you which article (masculine or feminine) to use, but in German only "die" has some rules. This is my biggest griped with the language and it's major flaw, when you pair that with adjective declensions and other sort of structures that rely on KNOWING which article to use.
replies(2): >>44002930 #>>44003131 #
bashkiddie ◴[16 May 25 08:12 UTC] No.44002930[source]▶
From a foreign learners perspective, it is easier to just learn the article together with the noun.

But there are rules for 2/3 of cases. https://sprachekulturkommunikation.com/genus-der-substantive...

You can classify by suffix.

* -ung, -heit, -keit -> feminin, e.g. die Schönheit

* -ling -> masculin, e.g. der Flüchtling

* -chen, -lein -> neutrum, e.g das Mädchen

You can classify by category. Every alcoholic drink is masculin, except for beer.

You can classify by phonetic spelling. That is probably the closest you have to Portugese.

replies(2): >>44003891 #>>44006005 #
1. ur-whale ◴[16 May 25 11:04 UTC] No.44003891[source]▶
> there are rules for 2/3 of cases

LOL.

And are they rules to remember which word falls in the 2/3rd ?

replies(1): >>44004226 #
2. nitros ◴[16 May 25 11:47 UTC] No.44004226[source]▶
Nope, but it's not so different to irregular plural forms or verbs in english.

Afaik: At some point in the history of the language there would(?) have been rules for these nouns, but not today.