←back to thread

410 points gpi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.43996445[source]
The article keeps saying overseas employees or contractors, but isn't more specific on who Coinbase entrusted with this sensitive customer PII.

The bottom line is Coinbase didn't adequately secure sensitive customer information, and it was leaked.

Not, "Gosh, 'overseas' people, what can ya do?"

replies(12): >>43996466 #>>43996524 #>>43996557 #>>43996649 #>>43996661 #>>43996746 #>>43997312 #>>43997316 #>>43997530 #>>43997817 #>>43997825 #>>43998830 #
voidspark ◴[] No.43996649[source]
How can customer support operate without knowing anything about the customer?
replies(4): >>43996708 #>>43996714 #>>43996892 #>>43996992 #
dowager_dan99 ◴[] No.43996992[source]
CS can validate without knowing the details, the same way you don't enter a password and then check to see if that matches the password in the system.

The fact that they keep blaming overseas customer support is pure blame shifting - you still hired someone and gave them access to all this data, Coinbase!

replies(2): >>43997259 #>>44003838 #
1. mlrtime ◴[] No.44003838[source]
Where do you see blame, this is a fact and it's relevant.

If they didn't say this, there would be pitchforks out about not giving enough information.