←back to thread

190 points arittr | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.491s | source
Show context
antirez ◴[] No.44003190[source]
So because they need to have a better business model, they will try to move users to weaker models compared to the best available? This "AI inside the editor" thing makes every day less sense in many dimensions: it makes you not really capable of escaping the accept, accept, accept trap. It makes the design interaction with the LLM too much about code and too little about the design itself. And you can't do what many of us do: have that three subscriptions for the top LLMs available (it's 60$ for 3, after all) and use each for it's best. And by default write your stuff without help if LLMs are not needed in a given moment.
replies(8): >>44003218 #>>44003232 #>>44003442 #>>44003514 #>>44004509 #>>44006515 #>>44007143 #>>44007522 #
visarga ◴[] No.44003218[source]
> it makes you not really capable of escaping the accept, accept, accept trap

The definition of vibe coding - trust the process, let it make errors and recover

replies(1): >>44003566 #
1. conartist6 ◴[] No.44003566[source]
"press pay to think for me button" "press pay to think for me button" "press pay to think for me button" "press pay to think for me button" "press pay to think for me button" I love it
replies(1): >>44004299 #
2. DrBenCarson ◴[] No.44004299[source]
“Hmm seems we’re very far off course but we have thousands of lines…I can’t figure all that out rn…press magic thinking button”