←back to thread

A leap year check in three instructions

(hueffner.de)
420 points gnabgib | 1 comments | 15 May 25 21:57 UTC | HN request time: 0.284s | source
Show context
Quenby ◴[16 May 25 08:27 UTC] No.44003014[source]▶
Never thought a leap year check could be this interesting. Maybe low-level programmers had already discovered tricks like this long ago，they just never got written down? Feels like there’s still so much like this, hidden in old code, waiting to be rediscovered. If anyone has a collection of these kinds of techniques, I’d really love to dig into it.
replies(2): >>44003223 #>>44003465 #
1. arp242 ◴[16 May 25 09:46 UTC] No.44003465[source]▶
Lotus 1-2-3 famously considers 1900 a leap year (carried over in Excel for compatibility), presumably because it just does the "(y & 3) != 0" check (arguably a reasonable optimisation given the hardware of the time).

I'd be surprised if someone found this solution before, as it seems both relatively difficult to find and a small optimisation.