←back to thread

Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment

(www.nytimes.com)
1168 points jbredeche | 1 comments | 15 May 25 18:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
palisade ◴[16 May 25 05:32 UTC] No.44002113[source]▶
Does this mean when they grow up, their own offspring will also have this defect and require a correction? And, if so, does this mean it is now introducing this defective gene into our gene pool?

I know this is an issue with caesarean section. It is becoming more prevalent because those who require it are surviving, making it more likely to happen in their offspring.

replies(5): >>44002183 #>>44002703 #>>44003003 #>>44003254 #>>44006506 #
mondaygreens ◴[16 May 25 05:48 UTC] No.44002183[source]▶
How can they pass it on when they don't have the defect any more?
replies(4): >>44002237 #>>44002241 #>>44002247 #>>44002584 #
1. pishpash ◴[16 May 25 07:15 UTC] No.44002584[source]▶
If by "they" you mean their gametes, those were not edited. Only a component of their corporal shell was modified.