←back to thread

410 points gpi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.43996445[source]
The article keeps saying overseas employees or contractors, but isn't more specific on who Coinbase entrusted with this sensitive customer PII.

The bottom line is Coinbase didn't adequately secure sensitive customer information, and it was leaked.

Not, "Gosh, 'overseas' people, what can ya do?"

replies(12): >>43996466 #>>43996524 #>>43996557 #>>43996649 #>>43996661 #>>43996746 #>>43997312 #>>43997316 #>>43997530 #>>43997817 #>>43997825 #>>43998830 #
kragen ◴[] No.43996557[source]
It's probably hard to keep call-center workers bribe-proof.
replies(9): >>43996618 #>>43996626 #>>43996651 #>>43996654 #>>43996807 #>>43997178 #>>43997271 #>>43997359 #>>43997458 #
thepasswordis ◴[] No.43996807[source]
[flagged]
replies(2): >>43996951 #>>43997124 #
kragen ◴[] No.43996951{3}[source]
You are writing this as if you know what countries Coinbase's call centers are located in and the role of organized crime in their economies, but you don't actually know either of those things.
replies(1): >>43997019 #
apercu ◴[] No.43997019{4}[source]
Lol, that's because while Coinbase emphasizes its commitment to security and compliance specific details about the geographic distribution of its offshore personnel are not disclosed in its public filings.
replies(2): >>43997042 #>>44000711 #
1. AustinDev ◴[] No.44000711{5}[source]
The fact that offshore support is allowed to access KYC information for US-based customers should be against some sort of regulation.