←back to thread

410 points gpi | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.672s | source
Show context
thepasswordis ◴[] No.43996769[source]
The problem is that it seems like the data that leaked is also the data that would be used to do account recovery.

And what that means is that

1) If you lose access to your account (through either your own fault, or coinbases fault) that the process of recovering it may not be so straightforward anymore.

2) Hackers can try to “recover” accounts now using this leaked info.

This is a huge problem. What coinbase needs are IRL offices where you can go and do things like account recovery, and where people trying to steal money can be caught and prosecuted (and makes a huge barrier for the overseas thieves who are usually doing this)

The only solution here is: hardware 2 factor like yubikeys.

replies(9): >>43996798 #>>43998374 #>>43998426 #>>43999299 #>>43999324 #>>43999430 #>>43999499 #>>43999782 #>>44001348 #
SimianSci ◴[] No.43998374[source]
The Crypto industry continues their speedrun of rediscovering all of the reasons for why the global financial system exists.

What you've described is the same thing that many Crypto enthusiasts call a "Bank"

replies(3): >>43998471 #>>43999321 #>>43999346 #
woah ◴[] No.43999321[source]
Coinbase is identical to a bank because it holds customer funds. Your comment isn't quite the dunk you think it is. Blockchains allow money to be held anonymously without any banks involved. Centralized exchanges are just profiting on speculation and probably should be banned.
replies(2): >>43999368 #>>43999464 #
AStonesThrow ◴[] No.43999464[source]
No they don’t. “Cryptocurrency” isn’t money at all. Just because you can trade it in for money, doesn’t make it so. I can also trade in my hat to the Buffalo Exchange for money. But my hat is not money.
replies(4): >>44000015 #>>44000114 #>>44000919 #>>44002006 #
1. woah ◴[] No.44000015[source]
There is no bright line separating "money" from any other type of fungible asset
replies(1): >>44000665 #
2. AStonesThrow ◴[] No.44000665[source]
Except for, you know, being able to spend it where you buy things? And deposit it into an actual bank? Those seem sort of intrinsic to how we use money today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_tender

replies(1): >>44003896 #
3. Ukv ◴[] No.44003896[source]
> > There is no bright line [...]

> Except for, you know, being able to spend it where you buy things? [...]

The extent to which you can use it to buy things is a good metric, but I think that comes in varying degrees rather than being a sharp line or binary true/false. There are at least some things you can buy with cryptocurrency, and arguably there are some forms of "regular" (fiat, national, government-issued) money that aren't very widely accepted.