←back to thread

The great displacement is already well underway?

(shawnfromportland.substack.com)
512 points JSLegendDev | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
shawnfrompdx ◴[] No.43977897[source]
I am the author of this piece, and i didn't share it to HN, I don't hang out here. I just gotta say wow, tough crowd. i wrote this piece from an emotionally low point after another fruitless day of applying to jobs. I didn't have a particular agenda in mind. I was voicing what i've been through and some of what I was experiencing with no expectations.

you'll notice in the comments section that the population of substackistan is much less FUCKING CYNICAL AND NEGATIVE than you guys, with many commenters saying they are in the same position. I heard from writers, designers, engineers, going through similar times.

my portfolio site is https://shawnfromportland.com, you can find my resume there. if you have leads that you think I might match with you can definitely send them my way, I will even put a false last name on an updated resume for you guys.

for those who are wondering, I legally changed my name to K long ago because my dad's last name starts with K, but I didn't like identifying with his family name everywhere i went because he was not in my life and didnt contribute to shaping me. I thought hard about what other name I could choose but nothing resonated with me. I had already been using Shawn K for years before legally changing it and it was the only thing that felt right.

replies(40): >>43978061 #>>43978084 #>>43978111 #>>43978182 #>>43978270 #>>43978317 #>>43978368 #>>43978405 #>>43978575 #>>43978642 #>>43978686 #>>43979142 #>>43979293 #>>43979543 #>>43979644 #>>43980101 #>>43980125 #>>43980578 #>>43980737 #>>43981072 #>>43981864 #>>43982246 #>>43982254 #>>43982403 #>>43982630 #>>43982688 #>>43982752 #>>43982931 #>>43983388 #>>43983896 #>>43983905 #>>43985249 #>>43985329 #>>43988893 #>>43992247 #>>43993590 #>>43996740 #>>44016506 #>>44018751 #>>44019499 #
cloudedcordial ◴[] No.43979543[source]
Yes, please ignore the cynical and negative folks. They are not doing you any good.

Like what a few other folks in this thread pointed out, your resume and your portfolio looks outdated and fragmented on my first glance. Most recruiters and hiring managers spend 5 seconds max during the first pass, so first impressions matter.

Here are the things you can do to bring your resume up-to-date: * "Key achievements" does not include numbers to describe impact. For example, "pre-screen and match thousands of patients a day" could be rewritten as "pre-screen n patients per day and match them to m healthcare provider with 99.99% uptime" sounds impactful. * Self-rating of your skills is not necessary. Nowadays your description of your impact is implicit on how you learn and work. In addition, "expert" for one person may not be the same for others.

On your portfolio: * Listing your education is no longer necessary after the first job. Putting this in your portfolio site makes you look inexperienced. (Leave education in the resume, however.) * The screenshots for Nike and LG look outdated, which contradicts "cutting-edge internet experiences".

replies(5): >>43979700 #>>43981279 #>>43981694 #>>43982544 #>>43982552 #
CM30 ◴[] No.43981694[source]
> Here are the things you can do to bring your resume up-to-date: * "Key achievements" does not include numbers to describe impact. For example, "pre-screen and match thousands of patients a day" could be rewritten as "pre-screen n patients per day and match them to m healthcare provider with 99.99% uptime" sounds impactful. * Self-rating of your skills is not necessary. Nowadays your description of your impact is implicit on how you learn and work. In addition, "expert" for one person may not be the same for others.

I've seen this a lot online, but as someone who struggled to add this sort of data to my CV before, where exactly are people getting these stats?

Every company I've worked for either didn't know how changes affected things like uptime or conversion rate or page views or didn't share the information with the engineering team.

Do most people just make up these stats? Guess and hope it's somewhat correct? Work for companies that just happen to tell their engineering teams everything about the impact of their work? Actually go out and measure it themselves somehow, like throgh Google Analytics?

Just feels like it may be difficult for the author to show this sort of data, since they may not have access to it at all.

replies(6): >>43981936 #>>43982141 #>>43982431 #>>43982587 #>>43983959 #>>43989662 #
vidro3 ◴[] No.43989662[source]
same here, i've never had any stats or measurements about any of the features i've built.
replies(1): >>43992315 #
andreasmetsala ◴[] No.43992315{3}[source]
Then how can you know if building the feature made any sense?
replies(1): >>43999629 #
1. foldr ◴[] No.43999629{4}[source]
Engineers don't usually get to decide which features to build.