←back to thread

410 points gpi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.43996445[source]
The article keeps saying overseas employees or contractors, but isn't more specific on who Coinbase entrusted with this sensitive customer PII.

The bottom line is Coinbase didn't adequately secure sensitive customer information, and it was leaked.

Not, "Gosh, 'overseas' people, what can ya do?"

replies(12): >>43996466 #>>43996524 #>>43996557 #>>43996649 #>>43996661 #>>43996746 #>>43997312 #>>43997316 #>>43997530 #>>43997817 #>>43997825 #>>43998830 #
dheera ◴[] No.43996746[source]
Bribes are one thing, but threats could also happen. This is a big part of the reason why I absolutely hate entities that think residential addresses should be public record.

This is a precedent to Coinbase employees getting physical threats at their door just because e.g. some voter registration, utility company, bank, credit card, or court record decided to release their name and addresses on the internet. People could show up at some Coinbase software engineers' apartment doors with guns demanding they send BTC to arbitrary addresses.

replies(2): >>43996838 #>>43997481 #
1. Phlarp ◴[] No.43997481[source]
This is a feature of bitcoin not a bug.

If you sling code for cryptocurrency you and your loved ones are "in the game" now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20qee5030do