←back to thread

410 points gpi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
pentagrama ◴[] No.43997245[source]
Maybe it’s a naive question, but in many breach reports I see things like 'No passwords, private keys, or funds were exposed.' How come companies can usually protect that kind of data, but not emails, names, and other personal info?
replies(4): >>43997258 #>>43997270 #>>43997935 #>>43998132 #
1. selectout ◴[] No.43997270[source]
Companies want the ability to use things like emails, names, and other data for user experiences (go to settings, see name and change it), advertising (target this address book for X ad), etc. So these are typically plaintext (oversimplified) and accessible by different systems while passwords or private keys have one use case only and can have a higher bar of protection.