←back to thread

Human

(quarter--mile.com)
717 points surprisetalk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.241s | source
Show context
neom ◴[] No.43992243[source]
What this thread keeps surfacing, and so much discussion around this stuff generally right now, from speculation about the next phase of intelligence, the role of pattern, emotion, logic, debates over consciousness, the anthropocentrism of our meaning-making...is that we are the source of reality (and ourselves). Instead of a “final authority” or a simple march from animal to machine, what if everything from mind, physics, value, selfhood, is simply a recursive pattern expressed in ever more novel forms? Humans aren’t just a step on a ladder to “pure logic,” nor are machines soulless automatons. Both are instances of awareness experiencing and reprogramming itself through evolving substrates... be it bios, silicon, symbol,or story. Emotions, meaning, even the sense of “self,” are patterns in a deeply recursive field: the universe rendering and re rendering its basic code, sometimes as computation, sometimes as myth, sometimes as teamwork, sometimes as hope, sometimes as doubt.

So whether the future leans biological, mechanical, or some hybrid, the real miracle isn’t just what new “overlords” or “offspring” arise, but that every unfolding is the same old pattern...the one that dreamed itself as atoms, as life, as consciousness, as community, as art, as algorithm, and as the endlessly renewing question: what’s next? What can I dream up next? In that: our current technological moment as just another fold in this ongoing recursive pattern.

Meaning is less about which pattern “wins,” or which entities get to call themselves conscious, and more about how awareness flows through every pattern, remembering itself, losing itself, and making the game richer for every round. If the universe is information at play, then everything here that we have: conflict, innovation, mourning, laughter is the play and there may never be a last word, the value is participating now, because: now is your shot at participating.

replies(16): >>43992819 #>>43993015 #>>43993218 #>>43993719 #>>43993873 #>>43993961 #>>43994271 #>>43994619 #>>43994638 #>>43994832 #>>43996720 #>>43996948 #>>43997630 #>>43998342 #>>43999208 #>>44001333 #
1. xpe ◴[] No.43996720[source]
One way to think about meaning is a general pattern to which behavior matches. This would be similar to a teleological cause in Aristotle’s framing.

Another way to think about meaning is how a person frames the importance of their decisions: why does doing one thing instead of another matter?

I, like most humans, want to survive for a lengthy period of time and lead a good life. I want my fellow humans and all of our children to share in that.

The idea of some unknown and maybe incomprehensible grand “plan” — whether it be a Judeo-Christian heaven or some techno-utopian rise of next generation machine consciousness personally brings me no comfort. Why? It is a foreign concept very far from my experience. So foreign that I sometimes view advocacy of such philosophies as doing it for manipulative reasons.

The idea of human thriving changing over time is good and part of how I think about progress. Moral lock-in (see MacAskill) is to be avoided. I admit the thought experiment of “how fast is too fast” raised by Bostrum in Superintelligence (IIRC) is challenging and requires more thought and experience.