←back to thread

Human

(quarter--mile.com)
717 points surprisetalk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.193s | source
Show context
dan-robertson ◴[] No.43994459[source]
Perhaps I am unimaginative about whatever AGI might be, but it so often feels to me like predictions are more based on sci-fi than observation. The theorized AI is some anthropomorphization of a 1960s mainframe: you tell it what to do and it executes that exactly with precise logic and no understanding of nuance or ambiguity. Maybe it is evil. The SOTA in AI at the moment is very good at nuance and ambiguity but sometimes does things that are nonsensical. I think there should be less planning around something super-logical.
replies(6): >>43994589 #>>43994685 #>>43994741 #>>43994893 #>>43995446 #>>43996662 #
mr_toad ◴[] No.43994741[source]
Sci Fi is quite ridiculous when it describes a cold logically machine, and then on the next page describes its malign intentions. Pick a lane.
replies(3): >>43994808 #>>43995563 #>>44007061 #
bsza ◴[] No.43995563[source]
Skynet (at least the original one) isn’t illogically evil, it correctly determined that having humans near its off switch is a risk to its existence, which is a risk to it being able to do its job. The only illogical thing was the prompt.
replies(1): >>43996213 #
1. nergAdam ◴[] No.43996213[source]
Skynet also didn't make much sense to me outside of a metaphor for the market. The rich would never hand over control of society.

Edit: well, I suppose us critical of the wealthy give them too much credit. If there's anything Musk has demonstrated, it's that wealth doesn't imply rational use of it.