←back to thread

What is HDR, anyway?

(www.lux.camera)
791 points _kush | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
Terr_ ◴[] No.43990206[source]
> Our eyes can see both just fine.

This gets to a gaming rant of mine: Our natural vision can handle these things because our eyes scan sections of the scene with constant adjustment (light-level, focus) while our brain is compositing it together into what feels like a single moment.

However certain effects in games (i.e. "HDR" and Depth of Field) instead reduce the fidelity of the experience. These features limp along only while our gaze is aimed at the exact spot the software expects. If you glance anywhere else around the scene, you instead percieve an unrealistically wrong coloration or blur that frustratingly persists no matter how much you squint. These problems will remain until gaze-tracking support becomes standard.

So ultimately these features reduce the realism of the experience. They make it less like being there and more like you're watching a second-hand movie recorded on flawed video-cameras. This distinction is even clearer if you consider cases where "film grain" is added.

replies(8): >>43990881 #>>43990882 #>>43990946 #>>43991015 #>>43991652 #>>43991935 #>>43994357 #>>43994418 #
brokenmachine ◴[] No.43990946[source]
I'm with you on depth of field, but I don't understand why you think HDR reduces the fidelity of a game.

If you have a good display (eg an OLED) then the brights are brighter and simultaneously there is more detail in the blacks. Why do you think that is worse than SDR?

replies(2): >>43991035 #>>43991473 #
pfranz ◴[] No.43991035[source]
Check out this old post: https://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/thought-for-the-day/

HDR in games would frequently mean clipping highlights and adding bloom. Prior the "HDR" exposure looked rather flat.

replies(2): >>43991796 #>>43995552 #
1. majormajor ◴[] No.43995552[source]
That's not what it means since 2016 or so when consumer TVs got support for properly displaying brighter whites and colors.

It definitely adds detail now, and for the last 8-9 years.

Though consumer TVs obviously still fall short of being as bright at peak as the real world. (We'll probably never want our TV to burn out our vision like the sun, though, but probably hitting highs at least in the 1-2000nit range vs the 500-700 that a lot peak at right now would be nice for most uses.