←back to thread

Human

(quarter--mile.com)
717 points surprisetalk | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
l33tbro ◴[] No.43991582[source]
Doesn't really make much sense. It states that this is a purely mechanistic world with no emotion. So why would a machine be "bored" and wish to create a human?
replies(6): >>43991626 #>>43991690 #>>43992605 #>>43992818 #>>43997598 #>>43998101 #
pazimzadeh ◴[] No.43991626[source]
yeah, more on the environmental constraints and where the machines even come from would be nice

> There is no emotion. There is no art. There is only logic

also this type of pure humanism seems disrespectful or just presumptuous, as if we are the only species which might be capable of "emotion, art and logic" even though we already have living counterexamples

replies(2): >>43991739 #>>43996663 #
IAmGraydon ◴[] No.43991739[source]
Disrespectful? Of whom? It's a work of fiction. There's really no need to find something to offend you wherever you look.
replies(1): >>43992333 #
pazimzadeh ◴[] No.43992333[source]
of other animals

but yeah I'm not sure that was the right word, just seems wrong. basically humanism seems like racism but towards other species. I guess speciesist?

replies(2): >>43992618 #>>43992798 #
lukas099 ◴[] No.43992618[source]
My take was that other animals didn’t exist either, in the story.
replies(1): >>43993699 #
1. pazimzadeh ◴[] No.43993699{3}[source]
well the story makes it seem like the only way to get emotion is by making humans. but every vertebrate has basic emotions. mammals and birds have complex emotions. humans are actually logical and emotions don't just happen randomly.

if the machines have no emotion it's probably because they didn't need them to survive (no predators? no natural selection?). which begs the questions, how did the machines get there?

replies(1): >>43996409 #
2. pixl97 ◴[] No.43996409[source]
>how did the machines get there?

Instead of a Boltzmann brain, a Boltzmann machine?