←back to thread

What is HDR, anyway?

(www.lux.camera)
790 points _kush | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gyomu ◴[] No.43984462[source]
As a photographer, I get the appeal of (this new incarnation of) HDR content, but the practical reality is that the photos I see posted in my feeds go from making my display looking normal to having photos searing my retinas, while other content that was uniform white a second prior now looks dull gray.

It's late night here so I was reading this article in dark mode, at a low display brightness - and when I got to the HDR photos I had to turn down my display even more to not strain my eyes, then back up again when I scrolled to the text.

For fullscreen content (games, movies) HDR is alright, but for everyday computing it's a pretty jarring experience as a user.

replies(8): >>43984624 #>>43984641 #>>43984694 #>>43984803 #>>43985865 #>>43986070 #>>43993667 #>>43994385 #
dmos62 ◴[] No.43985865[source]
That's not inherent to HDR though. BFV (unless I'm confusing it with something else) has a HDR adjustment routine where you push a slider until the HDR white and the SDR white are identical. Same could be done for desktop environments. In my experience, HDR support is very lacking in PCs atm. You can't even play Dolby Vision on Windows, which is the only widely-used HDR format with dynamic metadata.
replies(3): >>43986066 #>>43986199 #>>43986508 #
Suppafly ◴[] No.43986066[source]
>HDR support is very lacking in PCs atm.

I think it's because no one wants it.

replies(2): >>43986780 #>>43993256 #
1. dmos62 ◴[] No.43993256{3}[source]
I want it. And, I'm hardpressed to imagine a multimedia consumer that doesn't care about color and brightness ranges, unless they don't understand what that is. Every movie is recorded and many phones now capture in a range that can't be encoded in 8-bits.