←back to thread

437 points Vinnl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.316s | source
Show context
choeger ◴[] No.43992350[source]
I wonder if this will eventually lead to increased density and if that then leads to congested bike lanes. Will the cities of tomorrow regulate traffic between individual buildings?

Make no mistake, bikes are much, much, better for urban centers than cars. But the overall problem isn't cars, it's individual traffic in densely populated areas.

Certain policy here in Europe simply assumes that people stay in their surroundings ("15 minute city") and rarely, if ever, visit parts that are farther away individually.

Public transportation, however, is naturally biased. It can be much quicker to get 10km north-south than 5km east-west, or the other way around, depending on the city. And, of course, public transportation is often lacking quality compared to individual traffic. (Taking a bike across a bicycle road vs. getting into a crammed subway train in July, for instance.)

replies(13): >>43992403 #>>43992506 #>>43992515 #>>43992640 #>>43992684 #>>43992779 #>>43993186 #>>43993255 #>>43993455 #>>43993817 #>>43995605 #>>43996326 #>>44010287 #
1. pjc50 ◴[] No.43993186[source]
"15 minute city" is the most misinterpreted policy of our times. The idea is to try to make sure that there are enough services near enough to residential areas that short trips are possible, not to enforce this. It's just the oppposite of "simcity mode" where a huge area is zoned as only housing.

That combined with some anti-rat-run measures in Oxford (and any anti car measure ever) into outraged paranoia.