←back to thread

Human

(quarter--mile.com)
717 points surprisetalk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
irjustin ◴[] No.43991997[source]
Related but an aside - Lately I've really been wondering if Skynet actually is the next evolution.

That humans, like all animals before us, are a stepping stone and there is actually no avoiding machine overlords. It happens to literally every existence of life across the universe because the final emergent property of energy gradients 100% leads to pure logic machines.

At least Fermi's paradox helps me sleep better at night.

replies(11): >>43992087 #>>43992097 #>>43992114 #>>43992123 #>>43992130 #>>43992138 #>>43992250 #>>43992276 #>>43992500 #>>43994469 #>>43995106 #
OccamsMirror ◴[] No.43992114[source]
As a teenager I used to revel in explaining to religious people that I believe humans are actually just the evolutionary step between biological life and machine life.
replies(1): >>43992260 #
suddenlybananas ◴[] No.43992260[source]
I guess you fail to see the irony that your own eschatology itself is pretty religious.
replies(3): >>43992443 #>>43992538 #>>43995279 #
eitland ◴[] No.43992443[source]
More broadly—and at least in online spaces—I often notice that many vocal proponents of atheism exhibit traits typically associated with religious behaviour:

- a tendency to proselytise

- a stubborn unwillingness to genuinely engage with opposing views

- the use of memes and in-jokes as if they were profound arguments

- an almost reverential attitude toward certain past figures

There’s more, but I really ought to get on with work.

replies(3): >>43992558 #>>43992598 #>>43992631 #
1. buttercraft ◴[] No.43992631[source]
It sounds like you are describing people with strong beliefs. Religious people may have strong beliefs, but so do non-religious people.