←back to thread

437 points Vinnl | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.916s | source | bottom
1. dripdry45 ◴[] No.43991501[source]
I wonder if adding congestion pricing in small cities to certain intersections or stretches of road would work the same way. if people really want to go through the busiest intersections or areas, then they’re going to have to pay a little bit.

Then people question whether they are going to go through, or pay a little bit to keep up the infrastructure if they do.

replies(2): >>43991639 #>>43994146 #
2. anigbrowl ◴[] No.43991639[source]
It's one thing to have it for a whole downtown area, applying it to individual intersections or roads is going to be a nightmare for drivers and just generate more and more surveillance infrastructure.
replies(1): >>43992187 #
3. lrem ◴[] No.43992187[source]
Isn’t the surveillance battle already lost? For at least a couple years now? At least in Europe it feels like you’re passing a camera every couple minutes.
4. jcattle ◴[] No.43994146[source]
I think that would have the opposite effect. Instead of most cars going through the busy intersection (which is probably busy because it's the main way to get from A to B) more cars would go through side roads to avoid the toll. And then you have more cars going through mainly residential streets.
replies(1): >>43994852 #
5. healsdata ◴[] No.43994852[source]
Google Maps and Waze are already causing this without the toll. In my town, you'll always be routed down two residential, 25 mph roads to avoid the congested part of Main St.
replies(1): >>43995596 #
6. jabroni_salad ◴[] No.43995596{3}[source]
My town combatted this by allowing free parking on the bypass on both sides. Now it is practically a single lane road and you will hate every second you spend on it if you don't live there.