←back to thread

437 points Vinnl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
fundaThree ◴[] No.43989379[source]
I thought Hochul ratfucked this initiative for no apparent reason. What was the reason she gave for not ratfucking it a second time?
replies(3): >>43989434 #>>43989438 #>>43989654 #
burkaman ◴[] No.43989434[source]
She delayed it by 6 months because she thought it would hurt some candidates in House elections, and then she reduced the fee by a significant amount when it did go into effect in January, but it's still working incredibly well.
replies(1): >>43989547 #
fundaThree ◴[] No.43989547[source]
> She delayed it by 6 months because she thought it would hurt some candidates in House elections

Did she think that New Jersey residents vote for New York candidates? Do you have a link to the narrative?

replies(2): >>43989620 #>>43989714 #
1. burkaman ◴[] No.43989714[source]
I don't think it made sense either, especially because cutting the congestion pricing revenue last-second meant she had to start talking about raising taxes on the entire state instead, but that is the consensus on what she was thinking.

Here's an article about it, she hasn't admitted the election considerations so we can't know for sure: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/09/nyregion/hochul-congestio...