←back to thread

What is HDR, anyway?

(www.lux.camera)
790 points _kush | 1 comments | 14 May 25 12:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
gyomu ◴[14 May 25 13:44 UTC] No.43984462[source]▶
As a photographer, I get the appeal of (this new incarnation of) HDR content, but the practical reality is that the photos I see posted in my feeds go from making my display looking normal to having photos searing my retinas, while other content that was uniform white a second prior now looks dull gray.

It's late night here so I was reading this article in dark mode, at a low display brightness - and when I got to the HDR photos I had to turn down my display even more to not strain my eyes, then back up again when I scrolled to the text.

For fullscreen content (games, movies) HDR is alright, but for everyday computing it's a pretty jarring experience as a user.

replies(8): >>43984624 #>>43984641 #>>43984694 #>>43984803 #>>43985865 #>>43986070 #>>43993667 #>>43994385 #
sandofsky ◴[14 May 25 13:59 UTC] No.43984641[source]▶
While it isn't touched on in the post, I think the issue with feeds is that platforms like Instagram have no interest in moderating HDR.

For context: YouTube automatically edits the volume of videos that have an average loudness beyond a certain threshold. I think the solution for HDR is similar penalization based on log luminance or some other reasonable metric.

I don't see this happening on Instagram any time soon, because bad HDR likely makes view counts go up.

As for the HDR photos in the post, well, those are a bit strong to show what HDR can do. That's why the Mark III beta includes a much tamer HDR grade.

replies(8): >>43984892 #>>43985603 #>>43985943 #>>43986273 #>>43986614 #>>43986673 #>>43987025 #>>43988076 #
1. spoonsort ◴[14 May 25 16:44 UTC] No.43986614[source]▶
Why is nobody talking about the standards development? They (OS, image formats) could just say all stuff by default assumes SDR and if a media file explicitly calls for HDR even then it cannot have sharp transitions except in special cases, and the software just blocks or truncates any non conforming images. The OS should have had something like this for sound, about 25-30 years ago. For example a brightness aware OS/monitor combo could just outright disallow anything about x nits. And disallow certain contrast levels, in the majority of content.