←back to thread

442 points logic_node | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.346s | source
Show context
lanthissa ◴[] No.43973748[source]
this done well is a transformational thing, its just no one has been willing to invest yet, but the compute on a phone is now good enough to do most things most users do on desktop.

I can easily see the future of personal computing being a mobile device with peripherals that use its compute and cloud for anything serious. be that airpods, glasses, watches, or just hooking that device up to a larger screen.

theres not a great reason for an individual to own processing power in a desktop, laptop, phone, and glasses when most are idle while using the others.

replies(13): >>43973781 #>>43973797 #>>43973869 #>>43976591 #>>43978587 #>>43979114 #>>43979639 #>>43980207 #>>43981040 #>>43982455 #>>43982914 #>>43983353 #>>43983525 #
Gareth321 ◴[] No.43983353[source]
I strongly agree, and have felt this way for a long time. We are being sold many processors, each placed into their own device. The reality is our phone processor could be used to run our TVs, streaming devices, monitors, VR glasses, consoles, laptops, etc. That's less profitable, however.
replies(1): >>43983854 #
1. wkat4242 ◴[] No.43983854[source]
With cables, yes. And LG did that for a while in fact, they had a VR headset that would plug into the phone: https://www.cnet.com/reviews/lg-360-vr-review/ It wasn't a success but this was more software-related and also some hardware-skimping. It was a good idea, it just seems like the devs forgot to actually try using it before declaring it a finished product.

But wireless the lag is so bad that it's not really usable. Like Wireless DeX. Definitely not good enough for processor-less VR glasses (even the wireless VR streaming from meta does require significant processing power on the glasses end).