←back to thread

491 points anigbrowl | 7 comments | | HN request time: 1.36s | source | bottom
Show context
sidkhuntia ◴[] No.43982763[source]
This kinda solution wont work in India. People will use relatives phones to vote for the route and get the route approved, but in reality there will be only one passenger
replies(2): >>43982834 #>>43987180 #
1. pas ◴[] No.43982834[source]
Then votes should cost some money for the winners.
replies(2): >>43984016 #>>44002064 #
2. Loughla ◴[] No.43984016[source]
Which would punish low income folks for no real reason.
replies(2): >>43984062 #>>43987227 #
3. pas ◴[] No.43984062[source]
How? If you want to use the service you pay anyway, right? If you want a particular route you should have some stake in it. (Low-income / low-wealth / poor people ought to get vouchers and/or welfare payments - preferably as a gradual negative income tax.)
4. hollerith ◴[] No.43987227[source]
How about we give the low income folks money every month rather than crippling the resource-allocation system everyone relies on?
replies(1): >>44002069 #
5. sidkhuntia ◴[] No.44002064[source]
That makes sense. If it has something similar to a subscription or pre-paid model, then the chances for these kinda scams would get low.
6. sidkhuntia ◴[] No.44002069{3}[source]
How will that help ?
replies(1): >>44016321 #
7. ◴[] No.44016321{4}[source]