←back to thread

491 points anigbrowl | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.465s | source
Show context
jillesvangurp ◴[] No.43981512[source]
I like this; it's smart. It's a low tech solution that simply coordinates transit based on demand and self optimizes to serve that demand.

The value of buses and trains running on schedule is mainly that you can plan around it. But what if transit worked like Uber. Some vehicle shows up to pick you up. It might drop you off somewhere to switch vehicles and some other vehicle shows up to do that. All the way to your destination (as opposed to a mile away from there). As long as the journey time is predictable and reasonable, people would be pretty happy with that.

replies(14): >>43981629 #>>43981734 #>>43981761 #>>43981832 #>>43982029 #>>43982065 #>>43982311 #>>43982461 #>>43984012 #>>43984218 #>>43985477 #>>43987281 #>>43987568 #>>43988589 #
noduerme[dead post] ◴[] No.43982065[source]
[flagged]
pjc50 ◴[] No.43982372[source]
Buses aren't communism.
replies(2): >>43982405 #>>43983057 #
noduerme ◴[] No.43982405[source]
But communism is busses.
replies(1): >>43982429 #
1. pjc50 ◴[] No.43982429[source]
What does that even mean? You've never encountered a capitalist bus?
replies(1): >>43982536 #
2. noduerme ◴[] No.43982536[source]
I have. But I've never encountered a communist sportscar.