←back to thread

491 points anigbrowl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
kr2 ◴[] No.43981051[source]
Chiming in from Los Angeles, USA to say wow, must be nice living in a modern society that prioritizes public transit and peoples' ease of movement. I know, I know, it comes with trade offs of living in an authoritarian state, but the absolute abysmal state of infrastructure in this country is maddening. Ever been on a train in Denmark or Japan or Switzerland?
replies(12): >>43981063 #>>43981084 #>>43981124 #>>43981133 #>>43981135 #>>43981202 #>>43981218 #>>43981220 #>>43981231 #>>43981261 #>>43981282 #>>43981492 #
jmcgough ◴[] No.43981133[source]
Truly the worst of both worlds that we now have authoritarianism without good public transit.
replies(1): >>43981297 #
chvid ◴[] No.43981297[source]
I don’t see what this has to do with authoritarianism. If anything it is an example of the opposite.
replies(1): >>43981318 #
sandworm101 ◴[] No.43981318[source]
Authoritarian regimes traditionally touted public transit. From "he made the trains run on time", the German autobahn (which actually predated a certain party) to the lavish halls of the Soviet subway stations, to China's highspeed rail networks, public transit is just a thing that strongmen like to do. And absolute power certainly helps when you want to plow a road/rail/bridge through a neighborhood.

I watched an in-flight documentary about the architecture of soviet rural bus stops. Each one of them looked like it cost most than the neighborhoods they serviced.

replies(5): >>43981339 #>>43981381 #>>43981399 #>>43981407 #>>43981779 #
1. powerapple ◴[] No.43981779[source]
I guess where you come from definitely determine how you think: the bus stops look better than neighborhoods does not offend me, it actually shows collectively you can have something better than on your own, which makes a lot sense to me XD