←back to thread

442 points logic_node | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lanthissa ◴[] No.43973748[source]
this done well is a transformational thing, its just no one has been willing to invest yet, but the compute on a phone is now good enough to do most things most users do on desktop.

I can easily see the future of personal computing being a mobile device with peripherals that use its compute and cloud for anything serious. be that airpods, glasses, watches, or just hooking that device up to a larger screen.

theres not a great reason for an individual to own processing power in a desktop, laptop, phone, and glasses when most are idle while using the others.

replies(13): >>43973781 #>>43973797 #>>43973869 #>>43976591 #>>43978587 #>>43979114 #>>43979639 #>>43980207 #>>43981040 #>>43982455 #>>43982914 #>>43983353 #>>43983525 #
bongodongobob ◴[] No.43978587[source]
A laptop wins everytime because I don't have to carry around all my peripherals and set em all up again. Unless there's going to be dock setups in every conference room, coffee shop, table in my house, airplane, car, deck, etc, a laptop makes more sense.
replies(1): >>43979604 #
jml7c5 ◴[] No.43979604[source]
The peripherals need not be anything more than a clamshell screen + keyboard, same as a laptop.
replies(3): >>43980344 #>>43980904 #>>43982025 #
1. eru ◴[] No.43980344[source]
Than what do you save? Only the system-on-a-chip (CPU, GPU, RAM).

And the hardware to get an SoC with phone-like performance in a laptop or desktop form factor is relatively cheap, just because you have so much more space and power and cooling to work with.

(Your laptop-shell definitely needs its own power supply, whether that be a battery or a cable, because the screen alone will take more power than your phone's battery can provide for any sustained period of use.)