←back to thread

848 points thefilmore | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
bandrami ◴[] No.43969975[source]
Pretty cool that Linus Torvalds invented a completely distributed version control system and 20 years later we all use it to store our code in a single place.
replies(29): >>43969999 #>>43970002 #>>43970008 #>>43970018 #>>43970019 #>>43970028 #>>43970031 #>>43970032 #>>43970036 #>>43970037 #>>43970142 #>>43970154 #>>43970198 #>>43970282 #>>43970314 #>>43970343 #>>43970418 #>>43970419 #>>43970431 #>>43970434 #>>43970451 #>>43970472 #>>43970541 #>>43970904 #>>43971268 #>>43971299 #>>43971387 #>>43971586 #>>43988717 #
IshKebab ◴[] No.43970002[source]
Plenty of people use Codeberg and Gitlab. And it's still distributed - I don't need to lock files and ask coworkers if I can work on them.

Maybe if Git had native support for PRs and issues this wouldn't have happened. (And yes I'm aware of git send-email etc.)

replies(3): >>43970054 #>>43970113 #>>43970150 #
qwertox ◴[] No.43970150[source]
In Codeberg, how does one even search for files containing a given string? Probably the #1 thing I do on GitHub is searching for files in a project containing a given string.
replies(3): >>43970190 #>>43970201 #>>43971145 #
sph ◴[] No.43970190[source]
Given how terrible GitHub search in files is, what I usually do is clone the repo and run ripgrep.
replies(3): >>43970268 #>>43970391 #>>43970500 #
mrweasel ◴[] No.43970500[source]
But Github is actually pretty good at searching for something across all files in a repo.
replies(1): >>43971336 #
IshKebab ◴[] No.43971336[source]
Not remotely as good as grep.app.
replies(1): >>43977904 #
1. qwertox ◴[] No.43977904[source]
I was shocked at how fast I was able to find "Open an audio file and read as mono waveform, resampling as necessary" of whisperX in audio.py on grep.app.

It was instantaneous. But where do I go from there? I cannot navigate through the code. It shows me where I can find that string, but that's it. I also cannot look at blame to see when that line got edited.

Though thanks a lot for bringing this onto my radar.