←back to thread

838 points turrini | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.843s | source
Show context
titzer ◴[] No.43971962[source]
I like to point out that since ~1980, computing power has increased about 1000X.

If dynamic array bounds checking cost 5% (narrator: it is far less than that), and we turned it on everywhere, we could have computers that are just a mere 950X faster.

If you went back in time to 1980 and offered the following choice:

I'll give you a computer that runs 950X faster and doesn't have a huge class of memory safety vulnerabilities, and you can debug your programs orders of magnitude more easily, or you can have a computer that runs 1000X faster and software will be just as buggy, or worse, and debugging will be even more of a nightmare.

People would have their minds blown at 950X. You wouldn't even have to offer 1000X. But guess what we chose...

Personally I think the 1000Xers kinda ruined things for the rest of us.

replies(20): >>43971976 #>>43971990 #>>43972050 #>>43972107 #>>43972135 #>>43972158 #>>43972246 #>>43972469 #>>43972619 #>>43972675 #>>43972888 #>>43972915 #>>43973104 #>>43973584 #>>43973716 #>>43974422 #>>43976383 #>>43977351 #>>43978286 #>>43978303 #
ngangaga ◴[] No.43971976[source]
I don't think it's that deep. We are just stuck with browsers now, for better and worse. Everything else trails.
replies(1): >>43972138 #
slowmovintarget ◴[] No.43972138[source]
We're stuck with browsers now until the primary touch with the internet is assistants / agent UIs / chat consoles.

That could end up being Electron (VS Code), though that would be a bit sad.

replies(2): >>43972185 #>>43972270 #
scotty79 ◴[] No.43972185[source]
I don't think we are gonna go there. Talking is cumbersome. There's a reason, besides social anxiety that people prefer to use self-checkout and electronically order fastfood. There are easier ways to do a lot of things than with words.

I'd bet on maybe ad hoc ai designed ui-s you click but have a voice search when you are confused about something.

replies(3): >>43972233 #>>43972590 #>>43975552 #
bluGill ◴[] No.43972590[source]
If you know what you want then not talking to a human is faster. However if you are not sure a human can figure out. I'm not sure I'd trust a voice assistant - the value in the human is an informed opinion which is hard to program, but it is easy to program a recommendation for whatever makes the most profit. Of course humans often don't have an informed opinion either, but at least sometimes they do, and they will also sometimes admit it when they don't.
replies(1): >>43973164 #
scotty79 ◴[] No.43973164[source]
> the value in the human is an informed opinion which is hard to program

I don't think I ever used a human for that. They are usually very uninformed about everything that's not their standard operational procedure or some current promotional materials.

replies(1): >>43973219 #
1. bluGill ◴[] No.43973219[source]
20 years ago when I was at McDonalds there would be several customers per shift (so many 1 in 500?) who didn't know what they wanted and asked for a recommendation. Since I worked there I ate there often enough to know if the special was something I liked or not.
replies(1): >>43973439 #
2. scotty79 ◴[] No.43973439[source]
Bless your souls. I'm not saying it doesn't happen. I just personally had only bad experiences so I actively avoid human interactive input in my commercial activity.
replies(1): >>43984456 #
3. MonkeyClub ◴[] No.43984456[source]
> I actively avoid human interactive input in my commercial activity

Not to mention that the "human input" can be pre-scripted to urge you to purchase more, so it's not genuinely a human interaction, it's only a human delivering some bullshit "value add" marketing verbiage.