←back to thread

837 points turrini | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.231s | source
Show context
SilverSlash ◴[] No.43971991[source]
The title made me think Carmack was criticizing poorly optimized software and advocating for improving performance on old hardware.

When in fact, the tweet is absolutely not about either of the two. He's talking about a thought experiment where hardware stopped advancing and concludes with "Innovative new products would get much rarer without super cheap and scalable compute, of course".

replies(6): >>43972062 #>>43972256 #>>43972299 #>>43973089 #>>43973903 #>>43985499 #
ngangaga ◴[] No.43972299[source]
> "Innovative new products would get much rarer without super cheap and scalable compute, of course".

Interesting conclusion—I'd argue we haven't seen much innovation since the smartphone (18 years ago now), and it's entirely because capital is relying on the advances of hardware to sell what is to consumers essentially the same product that they already have.

Of course, I can't read anything past the first tweet.

replies(3): >>43972664 #>>43973073 #>>43974034 #
1. bluGill ◴[] No.43972664[source]
There has been a lot of innovation - but it is focused to some niche and so if you are not in a niche you don't see it and wouldn't care if you did. Most of the major things you need have already invented - I recall word processors as a kid, so they for sure date back to the 1970s - we still need word processors and there is a lot of polish that can be added, but all innovation is in niche things that the majority of us wouldn't have a use for if we knew about it.

Of course innovation is always in bits and spurts.