←back to thread

848 points thefilmore | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bandrami ◴[] No.43969975[source]
Pretty cool that Linus Torvalds invented a completely distributed version control system and 20 years later we all use it to store our code in a single place.
replies(29): >>43969999 #>>43970002 #>>43970008 #>>43970018 #>>43970019 #>>43970028 #>>43970031 #>>43970032 #>>43970036 #>>43970037 #>>43970142 #>>43970154 #>>43970198 #>>43970282 #>>43970314 #>>43970343 #>>43970418 #>>43970419 #>>43970431 #>>43970434 #>>43970451 #>>43970472 #>>43970541 #>>43970904 #>>43971268 #>>43971299 #>>43971387 #>>43971586 #>>43988717 #
SCdF ◴[] No.43970018[source]
I get what you're saying, but tbf hosting on github doesn't (yet!) box you out of just moving back to that system. It's still just git. It's still distributed, in the sense that if github goes down you could still generate patches and email them around, and then push back to github when it's back.

Everything surrounding code: issues, CICD, etc, is obviously another story. But it's not a story that is answered by distributed git either. (though I would love a good issue tracking system that is done entirely inside git)

replies(9): >>43970039 #>>43970120 #>>43970143 #>>43970151 #>>43970180 #>>43970299 #>>43970301 #>>43970480 #>>43970514 #
frizlab ◴[] No.43970180[source]
Like fossil?
replies(1): >>43970516 #
1. kaichanvong ◴[] No.43970516[source]
while --it-is possible seeing how fossil confuses, for the Github conversation, it's not really in the same category, conversation, some clever happenings happening within fossil-scm, however, it's not really the same as the problem design-led github solves given people saying downtimes; sure, git, github; however how people using github, different–similar, git, however, github.

However, were you to say liken-able (slang keywords: comparative something else--) of, "fossil with git-github", then again: no.

Good call were the conversation (comments, almost interchangeable at-times haha!) being, everyone use git for Firefox, something kinda wild-topic!

replies(1): >>43973099 #
2. frizlab ◴[] No.43973099[source]
I don’t get any of that. I tried, but no, it just makes no sense.
replies(1): >>43974827 #
3. kaichanvong ◴[] No.43974827[source]
;( I feel for you, hopefully–you can get more out from things in the future.