←back to thread

451 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jhaile ◴[] No.43964361[source]
One aspect that I feel is ignored by the comments here is the geo-political forces at work. If the US takes the position that LLMs can't use copyrighted work or has to compensate all copyright holders – other countries (e.g. China) will not follow suit. This will mean that US LLM companies will either fall behind or be too expensive. Which means China and other countries will probably surge ahead in AI, at least in terms of how useful the AI is.

That is not to say that we shouldn't do the right thing regardless, but I do think there is a feeling of "who is going to rule the world in the future?" tha underlies governmental decision-making on how much to regulate AI.

replies(10): >>43964511 #>>43964513 #>>43964544 #>>43964546 #>>43964647 #>>43964799 #>>43965877 #>>43966756 #>>43969913 #>>43974233 #
bigbuppo ◴[] No.43964546[source]
The real problem here is that AI companies aren't even willing to follow the norms of big business and get the laws changed to meet their needs.
replies(1): >>43968993 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.43968993[source]
This is pre iselt why we need proportional fees for courts. We can't just let companies treat the law as a cost benefits analysis. They should live in fear of a court result against their favor.