←back to thread

560 points bearsyankees | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
michaelteter ◴[] No.43965514[source]
Not excusing this is any way, but this app is apparently a fairly junior effort by university students. While it should make every effort to follow good security (and communication) practices, I'd not be too hard on them considering how some big VC funded "adult" companies behave when presented with similar challenges.

https://georgetownvoice.com/2025/04/06/georgetown-students-c...

replies(10): >>43965600 #>>43965723 #>>43965782 #>>43966035 #>>43966222 #>>43966281 #>>43966578 #>>43967558 #>>43968803 #>>43969670 #
tmtvl ◴[] No.43966578[source]
I vehemently disagree. 'Well, they didn't know what they were doing, so we shouldn't judge them too harshly' is a silly thing to say. They didn't know what they were doing _and still went through with it_. That's an aggravating, not extenuating, factor in my book. Kind of like if a driver kills someone in an accident and then turns out not to have a license.
replies(6): >>43966766 #>>43967142 #>>43967680 #>>43967819 #>>43968420 #>>43969894 #
LadyCailin ◴[] No.43967142[source]
This is exactly why I think software engineering should require a licensing requirement, much like civil engineering. I get that people will complain about that destroying all sorts of things, and it might, yes, but fight me. Crap like this is exactly why it should be a requirement, and why you won’t convince me that the idea is not in general a good one.
replies(7): >>43967245 #>>43967271 #>>43967301 #>>43967749 #>>43967914 #>>43968373 #>>43970478 #
motorest ◴[] No.43967271[source]
> This is exactly why I think software engineering should require a licensing requirement, much like civil engineering.

Civil engineering requires licensing because there are specific activities that are reserved for licensed engineers, namely things that can result in many people dying.

If a major screwup doesn't even motivate victims to sue a company then a license is not justified.

replies(2): >>43967584 #>>43967832 #
1. LordDragonfang ◴[] No.43967584[source]
Conversely, it's the scale, not magnitude. A single physical infrastructure failure can usually only harm a very limited number of people. A digital infrastructure breach can trivially harm millions.

Observing that each individual harm may not be worth the effort of suing over is evidence that the justice system is not effective at addressing harm in the aggregate, not evidence of lack of major harm.