←back to thread

Embeddings are underrated (2024)

(technicalwriting.dev)
484 points jxmorris12 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kaycebasques ◴[] No.43964290[source]
Hello, I wrote this. Thank you for reading!

The post was previously discussed 6 months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42013762

To be clear, when I said "embeddings are underrated" I was only arguing that my fellow technical writers (TWs) were not paying enough attention to a very useful new tool in the TW toolbox. I know that the statement sounds silly to ML practitioners, who very much don't "underrate" embeddings.

I know that the post is light on details regarding how exactly we apply embeddings in TW. I have some projects and other blog posts in the pipeline. Short story long, embeddings are important because they can help us make progress on the 3 intractable challenges of TW: https://technicalwriting.dev/strategy/challenges.html

replies(6): >>43964625 #>>43965226 #>>43965364 #>>43965743 #>>43966818 #>>43967786 #
theletterf ◴[] No.43965364[source]
Perhaps you should make the post more appealing to tech writers and less to ML experts. That would help increase the reach for the intended target audience. For example, you can expand on "the ability to discover connections between texts at previously impossible scales". There's an applications section, but it's easy to overlook. Frontload value for tech writers with examples.
replies(1): >>43966329 #
1. kaycebasques ◴[] No.43966329[source]
Yes, definitely need to follow through on the follow-up posts and projects that show exactly how we apply embeddings to TW. Examples (in all their forms) are truly magical in how effective they are as a teaching aid.