←back to thread

Embeddings are underrated (2024)

(technicalwriting.dev)
484 points jxmorris12 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.194s | source
Show context
kaycebasques ◴[] No.43964290[source]
Hello, I wrote this. Thank you for reading!

The post was previously discussed 6 months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42013762

To be clear, when I said "embeddings are underrated" I was only arguing that my fellow technical writers (TWs) were not paying enough attention to a very useful new tool in the TW toolbox. I know that the statement sounds silly to ML practitioners, who very much don't "underrate" embeddings.

I know that the post is light on details regarding how exactly we apply embeddings in TW. I have some projects and other blog posts in the pipeline. Short story long, embeddings are important because they can help us make progress on the 3 intractable challenges of TW: https://technicalwriting.dev/strategy/challenges.html

replies(6): >>43964625 #>>43965226 #>>43965364 #>>43965743 #>>43966818 #>>43967786 #
luckydata ◴[] No.43965743[source]
a small nit: while I understand this is an introductory article, I think it's a bit TOO introductory. You should at least give a preview of a "killer app" of embeddings to make me want to read the next installments, I read the entire article and I'm not sure I learned anything useful or insightful that I didn't know before. I feel you held back too much, but thanks for sharing that's appreciated.
replies(1): >>43966309 #
1. kaycebasques ◴[] No.43966309[source]
Yes, as a standalone post I can totally see how this is not persuasive because it's too vague and doesn't spell out specific applications. My only excuse is that I never intended this to be a standalone post; it was intended to be a conceptual primer supplemented by follow-up posts and projects exploring different applications of embeddings in technical writing. Hopefully the renewed attention on this post will motivate me to follow through on the follow-up content ;)